RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cross-modality image generation from magnetic resonance (MR) to positron emission tomography (PET) using the generative model can be expected to have complementary effects by addressing the limitations and maximizing the advantages inherent in each modality. PURPOSE: This study aims to generate synthetic PET/MR fusion images from MR images using a combination of generative adversarial networks (GANs) and conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic models (cDDPMs) based on simultaneous 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MR image data. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study with prospectively collected clinical and radiological data. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 94 patients (60 men and 34 women) with thoraco-lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD) from February 2017 to January 2020 in a single tertiary institution. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative and qualitative image similarity were analyzed between the real and synthetic PET/ T2-weighted fat saturation MR (T2FS) fusion images on the test data set. METHODS: We used paired spinal sagittal T2FS and PET/T2FS fusion images of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging examination in patients with PSD, which were employed to generate synthetic PET/T2FS fusion images from T2FS images using a combination of Pix2Pix (U-Net generator + Least Squares GANs discriminator) and cDDPMs algorithms. In the analyses of image similarity between the real and synthetic PET/T2FS fusion images, we adopted the values of mean peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), mean structural similarity measurement (SSIM), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE) for quantitative analysis, while the discrimination accuracy by three spine surgeons was applied for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Total of 2,082 pairs of T2FS and PET/T2FS fusion images were obtained from 172 examinations on 94 patients, which were randomly assigned to training, validation, and test data sets in 8:1:1 ratio (1664, 209, and 209 pairs). The quantitative analysis revealed PSNR of 30.634 ± 3.437, SSIM of 0.910 ± 0.067, MAE of 0.017 ± 0.008, and MSE of 0.001 ± 0.001, respectively. The values of PSNR, MAE, and MSE significantly decreased as FDG uptake increased in real PET/T2FS fusion image, with no significant correlation on SSIM. In the qualitative analysis, the overall discrimination accuracy between real and synthetic PET/T2FS fusion images was 47.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Pix2Pix and cDDPMs demonstrated the potential for cross-modal image generation from MR to PET images, with reliable quantitative and qualitative image similarities.
